February's column never made it to their website (it can be a bit sporadic) so here it is in its scanned glory. I've put the full text below as well.
There's been a lot in the papers
recently about the rise of the robots in the workplace and how these might
displace jobs in the future. Yet, as I
recall, from the predictions on things like 'Tomorrow's World', we should all
be sunning ourselves on the beach by now whilst the machines do all the
work. It seems to me that most of the
things that are supposed to result in fewer people and more leisure time
(remember the 'paperless office'?) actually seem to achieve the reverse, but I
suppose only time will tell. However, I
do think there are some jobs that really don't make the best use of the people
employed to do them, and there was no better illustration of this than in Harold
Wesley Ltd., in the 1970s.
You see, Wesley's was notoriously
tight-fisted when it came to capital investment. Most of their machinery must have pre-dated
the last unpleasantness in 1939-1945, with just a few exceptions to the rule,
such as the second-hand printing press I mentioned last month. Old machinery tended to come from an era when
people were cheap and machines were expensive, so fiddly labour-saving extras were
few and far between.
For example, if we walk along the
corridor from the Printing Dept., where we were last month, we come to a room
where the wrapping paper is converted from rolls into sheets. There are three chaps here who are the
mainstay of the department, Frank, Albert (who is in charge) and one other
whose name escapes me. All three must be
nearing retirement age and seem to have been at Wesley's man and boy. Their role here is to diligently count the
sheets coming off the machine and place a cardboard tab in the pile for every
480 sheets (this being the quantity of a ream, in those pre-metric days). I'm sure there was more to it, but that
activity seemed to sum up the bulk of their work. I know it must have paid the bills but can
you imagine how boring it must have been?
There really ought to be a better use of people than that!
Mind you, Frank and Albert's work
would have seemed positively enriching compared to what Greta had to put up
with, downstairs. From time to time, an
ancient piece of machinery, which folded wrapping paper into neat squares, was
dusted off and put to use. This machine
worked perfectly well, but it had one vital element missing. It had no means of feeding the sheets into
the machine, automatically. Greta seemed
to be either the only one who knew how the machine worked, or was possibly the
only one who was prepared to use it. Her
role was to push each sheet into the machine, with her forefinger, time after
time. The constant procession of a
brightly coloured design making its way across her line of sight, along with
the mind-crushing boredom, had a tendency to send her into something of a
trance allegedly. I think it would have
sent me into a padded room.
Managers have a tendency not to understand that
workplaces are as much a social hub as a place of business, and that you mess
around with that at your peril. You may
recall the Crepe Paper Dept., where the girls wound the crepe onto a drum of a
certain diameter, then cut across the swatch to give them a pile of sheets
which they folded by means of something akin to a fast spinning wooden rolling
pin? Waiting for your turn to wind your
particular colour paper was a chance for the girls to have a natter and a break
from monotonously folding sheet after sheet.
At least, it was until Wesley's employed a Work Study Engineer (I was
his assistant, I seem to have specialised in finding unpopular jobs for myself
over the years) who redesigned the process so that one girl did all of the
winding for the entire department, ensuring the others were not distracted from
their task of folding the sheets. I'm
sure it was more efficient, but I'll bet it wasn't anywhere near as
interesting, and that would be saying something!
You can find Philip's most recent collection of stories, 'Crutches for
Ducks' at http://getbook.at/crutchesforducks
No comments:
Post a Comment